This is more a rant than the rest, and a bit faraway from the dialogue of hiking, and hiking clothes for women. Yes I would love to start a clothes firm of my own which would even have it’s personal “social mission” so to talk. Clothes corporations objectives are earning profits by targeting women. In the process the vast majority of clothes firms make the world worse for ladies. It is as whether it is an agenda against ladies. Probably most women’s types are designed and conceptualized by males from the drawing board to the final sewing collectively of the apparel merchandise. The few ladies who're in the women’s clothes design industry apparently are doing little or nothing to instigate a development toward better clothes designs for girls who want practicality, dignity and operate in their clothes. And that is the place the dilemma comes in for lots of girls who don’t care about “Looking younger” or “Being girly.” Women who simply need functional, snug clothes are truly underrepresented . Sure, a lot of people would say “Not so. Since a lot of low-rise or pores and skin-tight denims, and cleavage-revealing shirts and crotch-length shorts, and tastelessly-quick skirts are the type of clothes that most likely the vast majority of ladies purchase (judging by the prominence and availability of such clothing) , then it means these are the styles that can continue to be manufactured and moreover these sorts of “feminine styles” will make their manner into all forms of women’s clothes, even those which can be supposed to be for operate not vogue. ” So their women’s shirts are designed with “princess seams” and curve-enhancing stitches and many others. It is not the one clothes firm that makes “active-women’s wear” that incorporates trend into perform. It brings us again to the place we started. As fairly a few girls who posted right here on “Hiking Lady” have stated, they resort to men’s clothes for higher fit, better consolation, better freedom of motion and better sturdiness. I might say that basically unisex sizing is one of the best method to go together with some features that will help accommodate individuals who might need a bit extra hip or belly (each women and men). The vast majority of women’s “active wear” just don’t have it. ’s clothes. Men’s sizes are larger even relating to “small” sizes for males. I doubt that is inconceivable. In general, women can match into men’s clothes this way. The scrubs were supplied by the ability. I lately was working in a analysis facility and was required to wear scrubs. I advised her that in terms of scrubs, a dimension small pant does not match me and it's strange as a result of most small-dimension men’s pants match me. The provision particular person said she thought a dimension small would match me. The availability person said that it's because girls have hips and males don’t. I advised her that it seems that a lot of small-sized males would find it arduous to slot in most small-sized scrubs too. What a lot of people seem to forget is that some men do have fairly-outstanding hips and nearly all of men’s clothes are meant for men with completely straight hips. In fact when men get older, in their 40s they fairly often develop larger hips. Years in the past, I recall a radio commercial for a particular form of Levis jeans which were meant for older males and it was mentioned that the features had extra room in the hip and thigh. Yet men have a better deal in terms of clothes. Women’s clothing is at all times made to include fashion fairly than function. EMS and REI and Sierra Buying and selling Put up, and Moosejaw, and Cabela’s and Sportsman’s Guide, and varied different such stores, or on-line stores have some of the higher sorts of clothes meant for hiking and different out of doors actions. Manufacturers such as Ex-Officio, Arctryx, The North Face, Sherpa, Marmot, Mammut, Mountain Hardwear, Columbia and various others. These brands are likely to have the very best supplies, and the most effective options. They've one of the best mix of fabrics so as to be lightweight as doable for hot days and which may protect in cold days with out a lot of bulk. They tend to have SPF inbuilt to protect the wearer from the sun’s rays. I had to make use of a large measurement to have room for my shoulders and arms however then the part of the jacket that was below the waist bellowed out and simply was uncomfortable to put on and simply had a really awkward look to it. But, I've seen such absurdly-minimize jackets for ladies by The North Face. It was “merely” meant to boost the female form while being “useful” for outside activity, or that is what the designers had in thoughts and but I have to surprise what they have been thinking by making a jacket like this. It felt tight and restricting when i moved. I don’t know how it ever bought manufactured and doubtless thousands were made and it appeared to be a waste of time and materials and it seemed as if the “quality control people” missed some main design flaws. I want I wrote down the model number so that maybe I may discover a hyperlink to it in the internet and maybe you all can see for yourself. There are different women’s energetic put on that may not be as excessive but which nonetheless have sufficient lack of function so that the majority lively girls simply cannot use them. The Gap and Outdated Navy aren't particularly for energetic put on but they have small line of such clothing. I believe that they are terrible in materials and design. The Hole, Outdated Navy, Modell’s, Goal, Okay-Mart and different such stores, primarily solely have clothes product of cotton ( with a number of exceptions). Modell’s is alleged to be a “sports store” nevertheless it carries train clothing for women which is made by Nike, Addidas (and many others) and although these are nicely-identified model names, I discover that they actually put too much style into clothes on the expense of operate. They went out of business years ago but they also had clothes for women that I discovered to be impractically designed. In New York City the place I dwell there is one REI and two EMSs and one not-as-well-identified retailer in lower Manhattan which sells all kinds of outside/camping/hiking equipment and clothing. There was once a retailer in NYC called Herman’s and another known as Robbin’s. Removed from it. I've seen ladies in these stores talking to sales associates and saying that they've seemed everywhere for extra sensible designs . There is an organization that a whole lot of you in all probability have heard of referred to as “Title 9.” They strictly make women’s lively wear. There are numerous Modell’s and one Sports Authority, and some Previous Navy’s and It would appear that there are quite a lot of stores that would have something for every girl. Guess what? It doesn’t work. The majority of their types are meant to “enhance figures” and make the wearer “look feminine” whereas enjoying sports activities or partaking in rugged outside activities. Why do I all the time notice that the clothes that come the closest to being practical and rugged and sensible are the ones which might be discontinued and changed by those that aren’t? Their women’s bathing suits are actually ineffective. They're meant for girls who've excellent figures , even who're professional fashions and the bathing suits are sexist in my view. They might proceed a certain type for several seasons or they may substitute the type and by no means revive it. Why ought to any bathing swimsuit be “hi-cut” or like a thong and the highest be meant to reveal cleavage? Title 9 has had certain sorts of designs known as “Grab and Go” meaning that the clothes are so practically designed that you can simply seize them, throw them on, and stroll out the door to train or do anything else. Are you going to go swimming or surfing , or are you going to work in a “gentleman’s club” ? I want that it was as advertised to be. Throughout my life I have gone from store to store during sure instances of the year on the lookout for the most effective rugged and useful clothes for winter or summer season. It's at all times hard to find something close to what I want. It typically goes for footwear and slippers and different footwear too. I often must take no matter comes closest and that's normally in the men’s section. There are designs which I will go to my grave scratching my head over relating to why they have been made the way they were.. I once discovered some comfy slip-ons made by Teva. But the absurd factor was that the soles were designed with pretty-deep grooves that had been very intently spaced and they were throughout the only . Simply why aren’t sneakers and footwear made to be cleaned? They're the principle piece of clothing that can be touching the bottom and going through all sorts of disgusting stuff. I have had a fantasy of designing shoes that are meant to be cleaned and are simple to scrub. I can’t for the life of me perceive why such a design was made. To enable climbing on rocky or uneven surfaces, and yet it doesn't work on any type of foot wear like it works on a Jeep’s tires. I know that hiking boot soles are made like a Jeep’s tires are made. Why hasn’t any clothes manufacturer seen this? With footwear, small rocks and mud and leaves and branches (etc) get stuck within the grooves of hiking boot soles. With a Jeep’s wheels, the fixed and intense rolling of the tires means that plenty of the debris will be hurled off. No human can create that kind of bodily drive to continually power the mud and pebbles and debris to be hurled out of the shoe’s soles. The way that the grooves are designed it solely makes the soles exhausting to clean. It means that the grooves on the soles of hiking boots can be stuffed up with debris and would not help a lot in helping the wearer to effectively climb; that is that if the grooves on the soles of hiking boots are actually meant to enable the wearer to climb. It seems to me that if the soles are made of rubber there isn’t a necessity for such elaborately designed grooves that only collect dirt. I wonder why there aren’t chemists and clothes technicians engaged on a greater kind of rubber that grips on all surfaces or grips better on rocky surfaces or wherever hiking sneakers are used, and it might make it unnecessary to make grooves on the soles of shoes. I've noticed some unusual designs that don't contribute to operate. It appears to me that grooves are simply put on the soles of shoes for fashion purposes. This goes for sneakers too. Quite a lot of sneakers which could be good in design in different ways, have very impractically designed soles. As far as sweatpants , scrub pants , and other such kinds of pants, there are these which have “elastic waist” or “comfort waist” and there are those with drawstrings. In fact I am not an expert in making shoes or shoe-soles and that i could possibly be fallacious , but I'm enough of an skilled in wearing shoes meant for energetic lifestyles and I think that plenty of shoe manufacturers are specializing in the improper thing. I ponder why any pant is designed with a drawstring when an elastic waist would make it pointless . Now-a-days a majority of drawstring-waist are made so that the drawstring is stitched into the again of the pants waist space. I hate something with a drawstring waist. I think it makes the drawstring less effective and it defeats the purpose of the drawstring. Underwear: I have been in shops similar to K-Mart and Target where there are a big number of women’s underwear. It is tough to search out the type of briefs that almost all of our grandmothers used to wear, not “hi-cuts,” not ” boy shorts,” not thongs. All are horrible for my part. I prefer comfort, sturdiness and straightforward-care. All that doesn't communicate for me. Something that gets caught you-know-where is unacceptable. I have been within the underwear part of department stores and other stores (I have to admit I never seemed in Victoria’s Secret however I don’t anticipate to find something practical there), and I have seen older ladies trying to find something that is age-appropriate and dignified and , again, sensible. There may be little apart from these hi-cuts. See one of many links under for an article about the historical past of women’s underwear. Even “briefs” will not be modest enough. It appears it has at all times been about bodily limiting ladies. That’s the way in which I have a look at it. Additionally one of many hyperlinks under result in an article about how there will be a women’s like of clothes which can be impressed by “Barbie.” Isn’t this 2014? It signifies that the elastic is sewn into the “hem” of the legs and waist. The closest I've found to what I desire is a certain Jockey brand transient “Elance.” It has “banded” legs and waist which is the better kind of design to get. Elastic that's merely sewn ONTO the waist and legs tends to be less rugged and the stitching can come undone more simply . I must order a dimension bigger than I usually would so that the waist wouldn't be too tight. One major flaw with “Elance” is that the waist is designed to be tight. And, I don’t understand the actual purpose of “athletic bras” the best way they're designed. I certain don’t care about “standing out.” ( I actually don’t in any case, and that i don’t care). Bras meant for active lifestyles ought to hold them in, nothing extra. I have heard of bras meant to “lift and separate.” I have seen some female runners who look like top heavy and nonetheless they are very quick however I'm wondering if they may develop again issues later in life. I know that I is probably not addressing the needs of girls born with certain sizes, or who've particular wants resembling after surgery, however sport bras must be made to have enough comfy tension to stop bouncing. There's a need for bras that do what some jock straps are supposed to do. I would like to design shirts and vests with tension built into the correct area that will make bras unnecessary. It could be wonderful for hotter weather and for simplicity, so you don’t must bother with attaching a bra and then a shirt. Simply keep “them” from transferring. Just slip into your shirt (and other clothes ) and you may go out to stroll , jog or whatever. Why isn’t there such a thing? I feel I discussed in certainly one of my previous posts that Coolibar had a reasonably good pant for ladies referred to as Solar Pant. I'm positive numerous ladies would need such kinds of clothing. I then installed an elastic band to provide extra tension for the reason that waist band could be a bit too large otherwise, and the pant is virtually a dream. I did have to change the waist myself by taking out the drawstring which concerned slicing into the again of the waistband space because the drawstring was sewn into that area. It is rather practical for lots of actions. It is not so long that the hem drags on the ground. It's not for very very popular weather however that can depend by yourself ability to tolerate scorching weather. It is of a material blend that's not like cotton. All pants ought to have pockets, but generally the way in which the pockets are designed make them ineffective anyway. I find it's a very particular person thing. That is how most hiking pants should be designed. It's a teensy bit too dense for very hot weather very much like the original Coolibar Sun Pant. It is meant for use with a belt but I discover that I don’t want one to wear this pant. I discovered a pant on Cabela’s that's for males, however which matches nicely and it is named “The utility Pant” (see one of many final two links under). It stretches a bit so it doesn't get tight if you bend or transfer. After all not everyone has the identical determine as I do so others might have a unique opinion. But on the whole this is an effective type of pant . In the event you do prefer it you need to write to the company and tell them to hang on these pants. One flaw with this pant is that the front pockets are designed so as the openings are slits virtually utterly parallel with the waist. I think they're going to discontinue it so you may want to offer it a try. The fabric stretches so it's not as unhealthy as if it have been with jeans with these sorts of pockets. It is an impractical design and that i don’t know why clothing designers make pant pockets like this. With these kinds of pockets you must maneuver your fingers in a more unnatural manner and even elevate the hem of your shirt to put your hands in your entrance pants pockets. It needs to be for type, nothing else. Pockets must be a line down the thigh, or a diagonal line is nice too. It's a good idea to have zippered pockets. Anybody who has ever gotten his/her open pocket caught on a door knob or the handlebar of a bike while passing by too close will know what I mean. But sometimes zippers could cause scrapes to the again of the hand when you put your hands in. There is a must design zippers of non-scraping materials for this goal. There can be one other men’s pant from Columbia. I feel I discussed them before (see considered one of the two hyperlinks beneath). Why aren’t any clothing designers engaged on this? They're of a very good material for scorching days, however for me, I found myself removing the belt and sewing an elastic band within the again of the waistband space in order to make the belt unnecessary. I journey a bike. I rarely use shorts even when i jog. But once more, I must settle for whatever comes near what I need. I came throughout a running brief known as Brooks Sherpa IV. I have a tendency to only go to clothes shops to take a look at designs and supplies . What I did like about it was the lightweight materials. I simply wondered why regular long pants are usually not fabricated from such a material. It could be excellent for a hiking pant meant for highly regarded weather. The fabric was very much like a very very lightweight softshell. There is one from the North Face referred to as The Prolix jacket. I love softshell clothing. It is extremely lightweight, not excellent for cold weather by itself however you may put layering below it. It is flexible and matches excellently and allows freedom of movement. But softshells are made for winter, spring and fall, not summer time. Additionally , why aren’t there any really really virtually-designed vests? The Brook’s Sherpa IV would make a terrific summertime softshell. There needs to be a vest for touring. I discover myself wishing for such a thing. It doesn't exist. Why not make one of lightweight and stretchy material? I do know that I have stated to much on this post. I will cease for now. I hope I didn't bore anybody. I have a number of ideas for the better design of clothing and I'll in all probability put up again with my ideas except I am informed not to. sports bra and leggings I could have been a bit political too.